That sounds promising.Beto is like a goat, and clearly cannot resist climbing on top of shit.
If Beto fell off a car or table at one of these would it end his campaign hopes like a Dukakis tank or Dean Byahhh?
Oh and Trump wants to investigate the "other side". So much for anyone thinking this is the best result in terms of the country not getting torn apart. He's going to make sure that happens anyway.
Takes bullshit to know it.
I wish it felt like 2018. To me it feels like the continued slow death of this democracy.
tbh sometimes I can't tell whether it's someone making a deliberately bad-faith argument or just being really fucking dumb.Also heads up that ResetEra is currently being inundated with bad actors and it's pretty obvious.
Twelve on one side, a dozen on the other.tbh sometimes I can't tell whether it's someone making a deliberately bad-faith argument or just being really fucking dumb.
I know Mueller is a stickler for rules and authority, but I would find it hard to believe that after spending two years on this investigation he'd be content with just staying quiet if Barr's summary was a major misrepresentation of the report.
tbh sometimes I can't tell whether it's someone making a deliberately bad-faith argument or just being really fucking dumb.
you must really hate pictures of trees.
https://www.resetera.com/threads/us...t-babs-is-surging.78319/page-85#post-14676703
For comedy's sake (we need it in this day of fuckery), here is when the 2018 election day thread turned and we thought we were gonna live in the endtimes. I imagine a lot of people will look back on today similarly and realize they were too emotional at the moment.
Fuck you. You're the reason we got here in the first place.
According to Barr if they don't find evidence you committed the crime you can't have obstructed justice.... which makes zero sense. Means you just have to obstruct so much that they can't find evidence.Eyy! What the hell does a guy gotta do to obstruct some justice around here!?
Reading Twitter. My bad, sure. But there are three main credible theories happening:
1. This is so bad that NatSec stuff is happening behind the scenes and Barr/Rosentein put a good face on it to buy time while it unfolds. There's a lot more to see here.
2. This is the best (worst) possible reading of a really bad report by Republicans being cowardly and the main thing to hang your hat on are the remaining investigations. (Southpaw)
3. Mueller was never going to do an actual investigation and he was only running out the clock while the Russian mob took over the US Government and consolidated power under a fascist puppet. (Kendzior)
I, uh, am going with #1.
The Senate results are a harbinger for the future of the United States. Things are going to get bad when a small percentage of the country has a monopoly on the most powerful branch of Congress.
Are you just being disingenuous or did you forget what the map of 2016 was for the Senate? (ie. the worst possible map to defend)
According to Barr if they don't find evidence you committed the crime you can't have obstructed justice.... which makes zero sense. Means you just have to obstruct so much that they can't find evidence.
Trump won all over again, folks. Wrap it up. Kellyanne has spoken.
This is the right strategy. Mueller critically pointing out that he did not exonerate Trump is the real buried lede that needs to be pulled out of the ground.
Reading Twitter. My bad, sure. But there are three main credible theories happening:
1. This is so bad that NatSec stuff is happening behind the scenes and Barr/Rosentein put a good face on it to buy time while it unfolds. There's a lot more to see here.
2. This is the best (worst) possible reading of a really bad report by Republicans being cowardly and the main thing to hang your hat on are the remaining investigations. (Southpaw)
3. Mueller was never going to do an actual investigation and he was only running out the clock while the Russian mob took over the US Government and consolidated power under a fascist puppet. (Kendzior)
I, uh, am going with #1.
Are you just being disingenuous or did you forget what the map of 2016 was for the Senate? (ie. the worst possible map to defend)
Are you just being disingenuous or did you forget what the map of 2016 was for the Senate? (ie. the worst possible map to defend)
The senate is not in a good place in general, but that map was terrible in 2016 as the map is terrible in 2020 for Republicans.[/QUOTE]
Assuming you're talking about 2018, this is in no way true. The only thing close to what we faced in ND, IN and MO is CO with Gardner.
I'm talking about the structure of the Senate itself. As time goes on the in the US most of the population will be concentrated in a few large states while a bunch of low populated small states will have most of the Senate. The Senate is already kind of like this but it will just get worse. I remember reading some estimates that say by 2040 30% of the US population will control 70% of the Senate.