Anybody who voted for Trump should be completely written off, and anybody's campaign who appeals to them is bad by association. I'm very smart.
The thing is that you don't need Bernie to do that. They switched back just fine in 2018, which is why the swings in PA/MI were so gigantic. (WI is gonna be Florida North going forward.)there is a non-zero number of Obama --> Trump voters we probably shouldn't ignore.
You're right that I don't think you need Bernie for that, but I don't think its the case that "they'll switch back just fine" with just any candidate. I think Biden would probably be the best for that. But like there are pros and cons to a Biden nomination.The thing is that you don't need Bernie to do that. They switched back just fine in 2018, which is why the swings in PA/MI were so gigantic. (WI is gonna be Florida North going forward.)
there is a non-zero number of Obama --> Trump voters we probably shouldn't ignore who aren't primarily motivated by ideology.
Anybody who voted for Trump should be completely written off, and anybody's campaign who appeals to them is bad by association. I'm very smart.
The reason it works with any candidate is because Trump ran as a Le Pen style European populist (econ left social right) and governed as a Paul Ryan (both right). He lied his ass off and is now paying the price for that electorally.You're right that I don't think you need Bernie for that, but I don't think its the case that "they'll switch back just fine" with just any candidate. I think Biden would probably be the best for that. But like there are pros and cons to a Biden nomination.
Even deplorable people want healthcare and can see the wealth inequality. It's why Bernie's economic messaging is so great. Returning to the status quo will not get this guy to vote for Democrats.
Those poor Trump voters, being misled by everything he's said in public over the past 4 years. Good thing St-Bernie is among us to enlighten them.
what does that even mean? i bet that guy sucks and will continue to suck even if he does vote for bernie, but who the fuck cares? if we write off every voter with awful views we'll lose every election down to the school boards.I never said to ignore them. I was just making fun of the messaging portraying Sanders as the Chosen One to convert them from evil with the power of his words.
Good. I know he's taken a break this week for his father's memorial but excited for him to get back on the trail.Pete is no longer taking lobbyist money and will return all donations already received:
You're right that I don't think you need Bernie for that, but I don't think its the case that "they'll switch back just fine" with just any candidate. I think Biden would probably be the best for that. But like there are pros and cons to a Biden nomination.
White, a little racist.What precisely is Biden offering someone in the mid west like that caller though?
Biden is the white supremacist pick for when you're white supremacist but also #nevertrump.Yeah, and I wouldn't see why that'd appealing vs Trump, who is that uncut shit.
He's not campaigning for them specifically, or compromising his vision. Someone who is chummy to lobbyists or big money will not appeal to this type of voter.
Just important to keep in mind when thinking about electibility.
what does that even mean? i bet that guy sucks and will continue to suck even if he does vote for bernie, but who the fuck cares? if we write off every voter with awful views we'll lose every election down to the school boards.
Biden is the white supremacist pick for when you're white supremacist but also #nevertrump.
Biden is the white supremacist pick for when you're white supremacist but also #nevertrump.
do you guys like not actually want to win orIf Trump voters want to be decent people, let them make the first step. Apologizing or painting them as victims of a con is dumb. Trump's racism is front and center, that is who his voters are.
Truly it is a sad day for America when you can't trust the commentary on every candidates press conferences of every random internet user to be perfectly unbiased. Oh the humanity! What are we supposed to do. Watch things ourselves? like animals?
Attacking opponents in the primary is just a recipe for disaster (for Dems at least). When the general comes around, you have to ask people to vote for someone you just spent 6 months telling them was corrupt, or evil, or (at best) "establishment".
Run on issues and plans. "Joe Biden's plan for healthcare will fail because of X, Y, Z.". Even "Joe Biden is in the pocket of the oil companies" is a recipe for disaster, because if he wins the nomination, you've got to explain why people should vote for someone you think its taking bribes.
That will never happen though. Playing to people's base instincts is the path to success. "Joe Biden eats babies" gets way more votes than "let' me explain the economics behind higher education to you".
Joe Biden's closeness to big money interests and his defense of big moneyed interests is an issue; it's not a personal attack. They called it out in their own way. I'm sure they will keep doing that and I hope that they do, even more forcefully. While I understand your point, it seems like your suggestion comes close to granting candidates with bad policies and bad records a de facto shield during the primary. I don't agree with that.
I'm not interested in a dog show. I want my candidates to attack worse, bad ideas and defend and advocate for better ones. And that also includes attacking proponents of those bad ideas.
Are you suggesting you can't win the presidency unless you go hug some racists?
I think they're saying you want to get some of those Obama -> Trump voters back in swing states.
That's not being disputed. But there is no need to make excuses for them to achieve that.
IDK, soothing people's fragile egos is usually pretty effective.But there is no need to make excuses for them to achieve that.
AOC joins Bernie in backing voting rights for prisoners
Stepping into the debate over whether imprisoned felons should be allowed to vote, Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez endorsed the idea and advised opponents they risked "looking completely + utterly out of touch w/ the reality [of] our prison system."
https://news.yahoo.com/aoc-joins-bernie-in-backing-voting-rights-for-prisoners-163930237.html
I understand what you mean, I agree things have to be measured to some extent. But I don't think Warren and Sanders' statements were anything close to severe.While what you said is true that's only half the battle, the attacks can't be too severe or when an opponent wins it'll be harder for that opponent to form a coalition with their opposition's voters weakening the nominee in the general.
yeah were fucked lolAre you suggesting you can't win the presidency unless you go hug some racists?
personally i don't give a fuck what you believe in your heart as long as you bend your political will in the right direction. there are racists and bigots everywhere, canceling them and acting superior might feel nice but it does literally nothing to win and exercise power.If all Trump voters are just hopeless racists who can't be convinced to be better people, then our country is fucked regardless of whether we can turn out enough new voters to defeat them. Allowing 40% of the country to just continue radicalizing to the right and not bothering to try and engage with them or reverse the brainwashing is not sustainable. It's going to blow up in our faces. We can either whine about how unfair it is that we have to expend extra effort on shitty people and let the most evil and corrupt people in our society continue to drag that 40% over to their side, where they'll continue to get more violent and angry whether they still have political power or not, or we can actually make an effort. We already know they can be won back, because there are lots of people out there who were part of the alt-right that have talked about coming to their senses after being exposed to stuff like ContraPoints.
Why is this thrown back as some kind of "gotcha"?I'm glad to hear you'll be voting for Sanders then in November 2020.
While what you said is true that's only half the battle, the attacks can't be too severe or when an opponent wins it'll be harder for that opponent to form a coalition with their opposition's voters weakening the nominee in the general.
David Sirota ✔
@davidsirota
Thank you, @AOC.
https://news.yahoo.com/aoc-joins-bernie-in-backing-voting-rights-for-prisoners-163930237.html
Voting rights... good? Voting suppression... bad? AOC is going to melt a couple of brains if she endorses Bernie.
Is anyone surprised? Ideologically, AOC and Bernie are pretty similar.
As for her endorsement, it'll be Bernie or Elizabeth, but probably Bernie.
Yes but tbh minorities are not forced in any way to participate in that conversation. Getting white racists to be more normal is up to white people and especially cishets
she's probably doing what every progressive dem is doing, watching bernie and warren and going with whoever is more viable at the time of voting
Cool. You can tell Chris is probably the guy writing the tweets though.
I don't see how Beto can lose with Captain America in his corner.
I remember in 2016, on the old forum, when I use to refer to Bernie as Bernard to accentuate my disdain for him. It's a silly look, though. As is all the hyperbolic hatred for him I see around here. Sanders is flawed; I couldn't stand him when he ran against Clinton, and he still gets under my skin now at moments. But at the very least I'd hope most people on this forum would agree that he's trying to get this country to a better place. That should warrant him some respect. Something.Bernard is just replacing one useless egoist asshole with a built in cult of personality with another. No thanks.
Warren>Pete>Beto>Kamala>Biden>>>>>>>anyone else>Bernard>Gabbard.