Status
Not open for further replies.

Dream Machine

Member
Oct 25, 2017
13,085
Anybody who voted for Trump should be completely written off, and anybody's campaign who appeals to them is bad by association. I'm very smart.
 

lmcfigs

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
12,091
The thing is that you don't need Bernie to do that. They switched back just fine in 2018, which is why the swings in PA/MI were so gigantic. (WI is gonna be Florida North going forward.)
You're right that I don't think you need Bernie for that, but I don't think its the case that "they'll switch back just fine" with just any candidate. I think Biden would probably be the best for that. But like there are pros and cons to a Biden nomination.
 

Ortix

Banned
Oct 27, 2017
1,438
there is a non-zero number of Obama --> Trump voters we probably shouldn't ignore who aren't primarily motivated by ideology.
Anybody who voted for Trump should be completely written off, and anybody's campaign who appeals to them is bad by association. I'm very smart.

I never said to ignore them. I was just making fun of the messaging portraying Sanders as the Chosen One to convert them from evil with the power of his words.
 

Kirblar

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
30,744
You're right that I don't think you need Bernie for that, but I don't think its the case that "they'll switch back just fine" with just any candidate. I think Biden would probably be the best for that. But like there are pros and cons to a Biden nomination.
The reason it works with any candidate is because Trump ran as a Le Pen style European populist (econ left social right) and governed as a Paul Ryan (both right). He lied his ass off and is now paying the price for that electorally.
 
Oct 25, 2017
10,379
If Trump voters want to be decent people, let them make the first step. Apologizing or painting them as victims of a con is dumb. Trump's racism is front and center, that is who his voters are.
 

Tukarrs

Member
Oct 27, 2017
3,859
Those poor Trump voters, being misled by everything he's said in public over the past 4 years. Good thing St-Bernie is among us to enlighten them.

He's not campaigning for them specifically, or compromising his vision. Someone who is chummy to lobbyists or big money will not appeal to this type of voter.

Just important to keep in mind when thinking about electibility.
 

Deleted member 15440

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 27, 2017
4,191
I never said to ignore them. I was just making fun of the messaging portraying Sanders as the Chosen One to convert them from evil with the power of his words.
what does that even mean? i bet that guy sucks and will continue to suck even if he does vote for bernie, but who the fuck cares? if we write off every voter with awful views we'll lose every election down to the school boards.
 

danm999

Member
Oct 29, 2017
17,436
Sydney
You're right that I don't think you need Bernie for that, but I don't think its the case that "they'll switch back just fine" with just any candidate. I think Biden would probably be the best for that. But like there are pros and cons to a Biden nomination.

What precisely is Biden offering someone in the mid west like that caller though?
 

Ichthyosaurus

Banned
Dec 26, 2018
9,375
He's not campaigning for them specifically, or compromising his vision. Someone who is chummy to lobbyists or big money will not appeal to this type of voter.

Just important to keep in mind when thinking about electibility.

So how are we supposed to be a coalition to stand up against the GOP then?

what does that even mean? i bet that guy sucks and will continue to suck even if he does vote for bernie, but who the fuck cares? if we write off every voter with awful views we'll lose every election down to the school boards.

And you're not discouraging that activity. You should care since every vote counts in getting Trump and the GOP out of office. That's how it works.

Biden is the white supremacist pick for when you're white supremacist but also #nevertrump.

True, but would you honestly view Trump as the lesser evil with those choices? We'd be getting President Biden or President Trump, regardless of how we feel if Biden wins the nomination.
 
Last edited:

BrutalInsane

Banned
Nov 2, 2017
2,080
Bernard is just replacing one useless egoist asshole with a built in cult of personality with another. No thanks.

Warren>Pete>Beto>Kamala>Biden>>>>>>>anyone else>Bernard>Gabbard.
 
Mar 9, 2018
3,776
Truly it is a sad day for America when you can't trust the commentary on every candidates press conferences of every random internet user to be perfectly unbiased. Oh the humanity! What are we supposed to do. Watch things ourselves? like animals?

Attacking opponents in the primary is just a recipe for disaster (for Dems at least). When the general comes around, you have to ask people to vote for someone you just spent 6 months telling them was corrupt, or evil, or (at best) "establishment".

Run on issues and plans. "Joe Biden's plan for healthcare will fail because of X, Y, Z.". Even "Joe Biden is in the pocket of the oil companies" is a recipe for disaster, because if he wins the nomination, you've got to explain why people should vote for someone you think its taking bribes.

That will never happen though. Playing to people's base instincts is the path to success. "Joe Biden eats babies" gets way more votes than "let' me explain the economics behind higher education to you".

Joe Biden's closeness to big money interests and his defense of big moneyed interests is an issue; it's not a personal attack. They called it out in their own way. I'm sure they will keep doing that and I hope that they do, even more forcefully. While I understand your point, it seems like your suggestion comes close to granting candidates with bad policies and bad records a de facto shield during the primary. I don't agree with that.

I'm not interested in a dog show. I want my candidates to attack worse, bad ideas and defend and advocate for better ones. And that also includes attacking proponents of those bad ideas.
 

dlauv

Prophet of Truth - One Winged Slayer
Member
Oct 27, 2017
11,516


Cool. You can tell Chris is probably the guy writing the tweets though.
 
Oct 25, 2017
10,379
do you guys like not actually want to win or

Don't need Trump voters to win. Hillary's margins were ~80k across 3 states. So yes the D candidate should be above apologizing for racists or painting them as victims. Focus on turning out the D vote, that's what '18 showed us. The D caucus is has far less blue dogs than ever before with a 40 seat swing.
 

Ichthyosaurus

Banned
Dec 26, 2018
9,375
Joe Biden's closeness to big money interests and his defense of big moneyed interests is an issue; it's not a personal attack. They called it out in their own way. I'm sure they will keep doing that and I hope that they do, even more forcefully. While I understand your point, it seems like your suggestion comes close to granting candidates with bad policies and bad records a de facto shield during the primary. I don't agree with that.

I'm not interested in a dog show. I want my candidates to attack worse, bad ideas and defend and advocate for better ones. And that also includes attacking proponents of those bad ideas.

While what you said is true that's only half the battle, the attacks can't be too severe or when an opponent wins it'll be harder for that opponent to form a coalition with their opposition's voters weakening the nominee in the general.
 

samoyed

Banned
Oct 26, 2017
15,191
This convo is funny because circa 2017 it was center Dems who were like "we need to hug the racists and understand their economic anxiety" and the lefter side of it going "nah fuck them".

Not that I want to hug them now but if I can get their votes for healthcare I'll talk up healthcare.
 

Deleted member 2145

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
29,223
who wants anybody to hug racists tho? just campaign on your platform and take the votes where they come

if a racist wants to vote for M4A you want to stop them?
 

Tracygill

Banned
Nov 2, 2017
1,853
The Left



AOC joins Bernie in backing voting rights for prisoners

Stepping into the debate over whether imprisoned felons should be allowed to vote, Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez endorsed the idea and advised opponents they risked "looking completely + utterly out of touch w/ the reality [of] our prison system."

https://news.yahoo.com/aoc-joins-bernie-in-backing-voting-rights-for-prisoners-163930237.html

Voting rights... good? Voting suppression... bad? AOC is going to melt a couple of brains if she endorses Bernie.
 

MayorSquirtle

Member
May 17, 2018
8,460
If all Trump voters are just hopeless racists who can't be convinced to be better people, then our country is fucked regardless of whether we can turn out enough new voters to defeat them. Allowing 40% of the country to just continue radicalizing to the right and not bothering to try and engage with them or reverse the brainwashing is not sustainable. It's going to blow up in our faces. We can either whine about how unfair it is that we have to expend extra effort on shitty people and let the most evil and corrupt people in our society continue to drag that 40% over to their side, where they'll continue to get more violent and angry whether they still have political power or not, or we can actually make an effort. We already know they can be won back, because there are lots of people out there who were part of the alt-right that have talked about coming to their senses after being exposed to stuff like ContraPoints.
 

Madison

Banned
Oct 27, 2017
8,388
Lima, Peru
Yes but tbh minorities are not forced in any way to participate in that conversation. Getting white racists to be more normal is up to white people and especially cishets
 
Mar 9, 2018
3,776
While what you said is true that's only half the battle, the attacks can't be too severe or when an opponent wins it'll be harder for that opponent to form a coalition with their opposition's voters weakening the nominee in the general.
I understand what you mean, I agree things have to be measured to some extent. But I don't think Warren and Sanders' statements were anything close to severe.

More than anything, I think that if these tepid observations on their part are making some people ansty already, it partly speaks to the serious problems of potential nominee Biden.
 

Deleted member 15440

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 27, 2017
4,191
If all Trump voters are just hopeless racists who can't be convinced to be better people, then our country is fucked regardless of whether we can turn out enough new voters to defeat them. Allowing 40% of the country to just continue radicalizing to the right and not bothering to try and engage with them or reverse the brainwashing is not sustainable. It's going to blow up in our faces. We can either whine about how unfair it is that we have to expend extra effort on shitty people and let the most evil and corrupt people in our society continue to drag that 40% over to their side, where they'll continue to get more violent and angry whether they still have political power or not, or we can actually make an effort. We already know they can be won back, because there are lots of people out there who were part of the alt-right that have talked about coming to their senses after being exposed to stuff like ContraPoints.
personally i don't give a fuck what you believe in your heart as long as you bend your political will in the right direction. there are racists and bigots everywhere, canceling them and acting superior might feel nice but it does literally nothing to win and exercise power.
 

brainchild

Independent Developer
Verified
Nov 25, 2017
9,516
While what you said is true that's only half the battle, the attacks can't be too severe or when an opponent wins it'll be harder for that opponent to form a coalition with their opposition's voters weakening the nominee in the general.

Exactly.







Voting rights... good? Voting suppression... bad? AOC is going to melt a couple of brains if she endorses Bernie.


Is anyone surprised? Ideologically, AOC and Bernie are pretty similar.

As for her endorsement, it'll be Bernie or Elizabeth, but probably Bernie.
 

brainchild

Independent Developer
Verified
Nov 25, 2017
9,516
Yes but tbh minorities are not forced in any way to participate in that conversation. Getting white racists to be more normal is up to white people and especially cishets

I know I'm not forced to do it, but I view it as absolutely necessary for me to do my part in combating racism instead of just complaining about it.

she's probably doing what every progressive dem is doing, watching bernie and warren and going with whoever is more viable at the time of voting

Probably.
 

Deleted member 11046

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 27, 2017
942
Bernard is just replacing one useless egoist asshole with a built in cult of personality with another. No thanks.

Warren>Pete>Beto>Kamala>Biden>>>>>>>anyone else>Bernard>Gabbard.
I remember in 2016, on the old forum, when I use to refer to Bernie as Bernard to accentuate my disdain for him. It's a silly look, though. As is all the hyperbolic hatred for him I see around here. Sanders is flawed; I couldn't stand him when he ran against Clinton, and he still gets under my skin now at moments. But at the very least I'd hope most people on this forum would agree that he's trying to get this country to a better place. That should warrant him some respect. Something.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.