You better not be telling me that Biden is the Nintendo eShop.
More like Nintendo DSi Shop.
No one's buying what they're selling, since 2008!
You better not be telling me that Biden is the Nintendo eShop.
I heard a lot of people on the twitters mention an AOC run in 2024 or 2028 (which would be in the picture if Bernie or Warren win) but I feel it's way more likely that'll she run for senate.
The actual path to victory is Warren's huge issue. The problem with Warren's campaign is that she sort of tried to split it down the middle but people aren't really looking for that right now. Exit polls are exit polls but like 90% said shes either too left wing or too right wing. She has Pete/Klobb to the right and Sanders to the left, it doesn't leave a lot of people left to suck up in this really large pile of candidates.
She doesn't even have Biden's credentials of being Obama's VP to hopefully jump start her campaign, its not an envious position to be in. I guess she could stay in and pray to God that Sanders gets a heart attack. That's not really a great thing to bet on honestly and its not really guaranteed for her to net all of Sanders' supporters especially considering that spat they had.
Warren's campaign woes are 100% her own doing, she is a good policy wonk but an awful campaigner
Especially since she's still 3rd place in delegate count.Nah. If Bernie can stay in well after being mathematically eliminated, Warren can stay in until Super Tuesday. If she stays after ST, then her ego will be proven to be just as bad, but for now it's only fair that she continues if she wants.
I'm not saying she should bet on it. I'm saying we as progressive voters should want that safety valve. What she should bet on is similar to what Klob bet on when she didn't get out of the race earlier. Bet on the fact that this is a long race, nothing is set in stone, and narratives and publicity can change fairly easily and quickly.The poster before me literally proposed that Warren stay as a "progressive safety valve". I am not suggesting that as a reason to keep a poorly performing campaign afloat, if you read the sentences afterwards.
It is a super dumb thing to bet on, especially since it doesn't even guarantee netting the supporters you need.
Trump is gonna get: Florida, North Carolina, Nebraska +, Arizona out of thoseIs there an interactive delegate map like this, but for the dem primary?
270toWin - 2024 Presidential Election Interactive Map
Create your own forecast for the 2024 presidential electionwww.270towin.com
Trump is gonna get: Florida, North Carolina, Nebraska +, Arizona out of those
What's happening right now is best case scenario for Bernie. His most formidable opponent, Biden, has collapsed, and the two moderates with no PoC support are splitting the moderate vote.I'm sorry but can we stop pretending like Pete and Klobes didn't perform really really really well? Even and especially as Sanders supporters we have to examine this result very closely. And make sure it never happens again.
agreedWhat's happening right now is best case scenario for Bernie. His most formidable opponent, Biden, has collapsed, and the two moderates with no PoC support are splitting the moderate vote.
If Bernie wins the nom, Florida is guaranteed TrumpI want to do a map but with the dem candidates,
Like bernie looks like he's winning now, but I'm guessing bernie won't do as well in more Conservative states?
...
What's happening right now is best case scenario for Bernie. His most formidable opponent, Biden, has collapsed, and the two moderates with no PoC support are splitting the moderate vote.
Who even further splits that lane.This ignores the 50 billion dollar elephant in the room currently gaining Latino/black support.
It's better for Trump, because a lot of Yang's alt-right/4Chan followers will move over to him.
Trump isn't running in the Dem primary tho, weirdly enoughIt's better for Trump, because a lot of Yang's alt-right/4Chan followers will move over to him.
I thought they only ironically followed him? Like, as a meme.It's better for Trump, because a lot of Yang's alt-right/4Chan followers will move over to him.
Gotta look past the next month toward November, friend mescaline.
Knew it was the WSJ as soon as I recognized their douchebag font.
Scary socialism could be a big thing so he isn't flipping any die hard Republican states, but swing states like Wisconsin and Pennsylvania are in play and possible. No one in this race is realistically going to run up the score and flip a ton of Republican states anyway. It's all about the margins with presidential elections.Is there any chance states swing to Bernie because actually life is shit under Trump, Republicans so give him a go or is it very much teams, scary socialism? Could Bernie actually win enough states or is it so unlikely?
If I outlive the WSJ, I'm throwing a party and you're invited.
It shouldn't be that mind blowing that minorities have to compromise quite a bit when voting. It's white privileged to get candidates that pander to you and have a long history of support of your group.
Voting as a minority is always between suffering or more suffering.
I'm not a minority so I can't really assess or judge that.Bloomberg is not just 'a compromise', he's a line that shouldn't be crossed.
Literally every single candidate in the Democratic Primary is better on minority issues than Bloomberg, who is a racist monster. There's no compromise to be made here.It shouldn't be that mind blowing that minorities have to compromise quite a bit when voting. It's white privileged to get candidates that pander to you and have a long history of support of your group.
Voting as a minority is always between suffering or more suffering.
It would be some dystopian shit for sure.bloomberg vs. trump would be the "damn, we're too late" election
The compromise isn't on that question though, it's on the question of who can beat Trump, who is more of a racist monster than even Bloomberg.Literally every single candidate in the Democratic Primary is better on minority issues than Bloomberg, who is a racist monster. There's no compromise to be made here.
That's a wrong assumption to make if you look at any national GE polls - Trump loses to Biden and Sanders consistently in those and they're much better than Bloomberg.The compromise isn't on that question though, it's on the question of who can beat Trump, who is more of a racist monster than even Bloomberg.
Again, I don't personally disagree with you. Bloomberg's a red line for me, but I'm a white guy. I cannot in good faith judge or assess the compromise a PoC has to make with their vote.
I feel like the stressful likelihood for Sanders fans at this point is a moderate (or even Warren) dropping out before Super Tuesday. These last two races have been so close. If anyone drops out and that base lines up behind anyone but Sanders, he isn't going to keep winning.Well I was hoping Bernie would do a couple points better but things mostly went as expected (other than Klobuchar) and it's still hard to know much about the future of the primary until we see voting in more diverse states. Bernie has an advantage now and the fact that the moderates are so split is definitely helping him.
I feel like the stressful likelihood for Sanders fans at this point is a moderate (or even Warren) dropping out before Super Tuesday. These last two races have been so close. If anyone drops out and that base lines up behind anyone but Sanders, he isn't going to keep winning.
Seems we're still missing around 10% of the votes. Nothing will change but curious what the final % will be.
This isn't accurate. She's more progressive than Bernie on guns, and she is the candidate going hardest against corruption.Warren staying in the race, unlike Bernie in 2016, serves no purpose. She has no agenda that Bernie isn't more left or progressive on, she has no signature issue that other candidates aren't already covering.
This isn't accurate. She's more progressive than Bernie on guns, and she is the candidate going hardest against corruption.
In order to win the general election - to kick Trump out - we absolutely have to carry every state Hillary won plus flip the rust belt states. A more progressive stand on guns would go over like a lead balloon there, Trump would win, so it's not worth the risk. This is also what makes Bloomberg a ptoblem, the Midwest would never vote for him, he needs to fuck off.if that's the case then she should use the clout she has to make other candidates adopt those stances. I know I'd welcome that.
Yeah, it doesn't help.I'm sure having Sanders supporters consistently shit talk Warren and every other Democrat has probably soured many of them on the idea of backing Sanders.
Yeah, I really don't get people thinking Bloomberg is electable. The billionaire New Yorker only really known for banning guns and Big Gulps is not going to fucking play in the Rust Belt. I've lived in this region my whole life.In order to win the general election - to kick Trump out - we absolutely have to carry every state Hillary won plus flip the rust belt states. A more progressive stand on guns would go over like a lead balloon there, Trump would win, so it's not worth the risk. This is also what makes Bloomberg a ptoblem, the Midwest would never vote for him, he needs to fuck off.