This ad hominem is nonsensical and only brought forward to undermine my opinion.For someone posting so much, you don't read a lot of the thread do you?
Scum never does that, so he can't be scum. Right?I've already said that scum doesn't call for a mass claim in our meta, they certainly don't double down on it either and FEP knows that.
What are you talking about?I'm disappointed Gorlak would think there'd be such an obvious link.
This ad hominem is nonsensical and only brought forward to undermine my opinion.
Scum never does that, so he can't be scum. Right?
Why would they do it, though? No one would ever go for it. It's a townie spit-balling move, not a scum putting a master plan in action one.
I mean, not especially. I appreciate the pickle we have here though. Tbh, I'd vote you before either of those though. :/flatearthpandas wanna dogpile on Sorian or Monkey thunderdome buddy?
That you seem to think Sorian would so obviously support a scumbuddy, if Sorian ripping on the feps votes makes you want to flip feps.
I would too, but we have 4 minutes.Monkey is the one really all over the place though, I cfd there before Gorlak.
uh, I put Oliver James and turmoil on my list earlier today - the only big change is you. All over the place, hardly.Monkey is the one really all over the place though, I cfd there before Gorlak.
Gorlak not happening apparently. Maybe back here?
VOTE: Dr. Monkey
Pretty much. Between one bad lynch and another, I'd rather try something else u.u
I'd rather see turmoil > OJ > FEP
That said, turmoil is good but I'd rather have a data point on L_P/rac
In that post he says he wanted an LP or rac flip over all others?Check to see who was barking him down the most, that'll be the best bet for top candidate to at least start. I'm not quite sure why Sorian would use his 1-shot on LP because of this post:
At least from what I can tell from a quick glance.
So you think Sorian would hold his shot? I somehow doubt that.Sorian was really intrigued by the alleged L_P-rac connection, and so it's possible that the second death is his doing, and not a Serial Killer's.
Somehow, though, I think he'd shoot rac first.
That's not what I said. He could've shot rac and hit a BP.So you think Sorian would hold his shot? I somehow doubt that.
That is a possibility, and I would say if a second double kill happens then rac probably needs to go. That's more a D3 discussion though since we just don't have enough info.That's not what I said. He could've shot rac and hit a BP.
I agree that it wouldn't be very Sorian-like to withhold a shot.
I would say if a second double kill happens then rac probably needs to go.
Why would an SK need a reason beyond "he probably won't be protected" to shoot someone on N1?
OJ talked about protecting me early in the game, and then said something about unfortunately not having the tools to do so.can someone point out where oj softed a claim? i cant see nothing and its making me feel stupid
No. Is there any particular reason you feel it's likely there's a SK as opposed to Sorian shooting? Do you not think Sorian would shoot LP or you?
Why would an SK need a reason beyond "he probably won't be protected" to shoot someone on N1?
No. Is there any particular reason you feel it's likely there's a SK as opposed to Sorian shooting? Do you not think Sorian would shoot LP or you?
I mean there's only a few possibilities:killing off people with low post counts doesn't seems like a good way to hide to me
if i were to guess me, but i feel like your'e missing a lot of possibilities
If you believe Sorian would shoot you then what do you feel happened last night?