All the reads from Feign I could find:
Feign felt like a pretty decent player and now that we know his alignment that could make his reads worthwhile.
Is this because he said he was or because of his day one play? Because if it's the latter...
All the reads from Feign I could find:
Feign felt like a pretty decent player and now that we know his alignment that could make his reads worthwhile.
do you think LP is the bomberAnd to elaborate a bit more, I thought the second big Feign was completely unnecessary unless he was trying to get scum to stay away, so it didn't make sense for him to be scum aligned to me, but the role with what he described didn't sound like a town role either, so neutral? Why would a neutral have bombs? Oh a serial killer. And then it was just me trying to figure out how that would work in this game. Turns out the first post was unnecessary too, and I shouldn't have read that much into the second one, but hindsight and all that.
LOL you should catch up, you're about to do what I didthis is where i am at. I don't know why he would claim his role like that as mafia or neutral. It doesn't make sense.
Yeah I can see this looking like a mafia just trying to make a convenient excuse for a vote.I agree with you.
Good morning 🌅 folks. Let's start with this vote of mine which is based off the feelings I got while reading through the thread.
Vote: Feign
Sorry but the way you played and reacted aswell as interacted with other players just left me with a bad feeling. I believe that you might not me mafia but while reading through your posts I got the impression that you're a neutral with a different win condition than the rest of us town players. We can talk about it but I doubt my vote will change.
I super dislike this post. This is busywork.All the reads from Feign I could find:
Feign didn't make a detailed read of Monkey, but found her initial suspicion of his claim scummy, but moved over to reading her as light town that he didn't wanna vote D1.
There is initial suspicion from the reaction to the claim, then much later something to the way Chuggs increased aggression versus me and finally seeing him as someone trying to paint Feign as a neutral.
There's a fair bit of suspicion thrown here, but it remained kinda surface level in the posts, but it's clear from the tone he doesn't trust Chuggs.
Now things are getting spicier, Feign really doesn't like Maol and I haven't really thought about reading Maol much so I guess that's homework for me.REPLYING TO ZEM
We start with what seems like a joke about how he has to vote him if his scum play is like his own. Investigating the reply to Zem we see:
Which I read as thinking Maol might know from talking in scumchat to Zem that he is scum.
Later in the thread Feign in pinged pretty hard by Maol when he defended ATP for posting a list of players he wouldn't vote for. Feign doesn't change his read when later learning that Maol had asked people for reads like that.
We have a ton of suspicion, but are kinda left hanging :/
I do get the sense that ATP is very much in his pile of people to keep an eye on because of passive play early on.
The only thing here is he finds Zem suspicious for his awkward post.
Light town read of Faddy for wondering about what the game actually looks like under the hood.
Now we're getting a more detailed read. First quote reads as a fairly hard sus as he thinks nin's reads look a lot like reads made by mafia. He is perhaps toning it down a bit aware that he might read stuff wrong if there's a playstyle clash. Second post reads as a harder sus as he reads the read of himself and Monkey as flat out fake.
A light town read of Leo. This read is also contrasting some earlier reads, talks about neutral which references his read of Chuggs.
I just picked out the posts I deemed to be reads from Feign and not all of the interactions. Feign felt like a pretty decent player and now that we know his alignment that could make his reads worthwhile. Sadly like me he also dropped a bit out of the game middle of D2 and so there isn't that much content and it's all raw reactions and not analytical reads.
Man, this all looks like busy work.All the reads from Feign I could find:
Feign didn't make a detailed read of Monkey, but found her initial suspicion of his claim scummy, but moved over to reading her as light town that he didn't wanna vote D1.
There is initial suspicion from the reaction to the claim, then much later something to the way Chuggs increased aggression versus me and finally seeing him as someone trying to paint Feign as a neutral.
There's a fair bit of suspicion thrown here, but it remained kinda surface level in the posts, but it's clear from the tone he doesn't trust Chuggs.
Now things are getting spicier, Feign really doesn't like Maol and I haven't really thought about reading Maol much so I guess that's homework for me.REPLYING TO ZEM
We start with what seems like a joke about how he has to vote him if his scum play is like his own. Investigating the reply to Zem we see:
Which I read as thinking Maol might know from talking in scumchat to Zem that he is scum.
Later in the thread Feign in pinged pretty hard by Maol when he defended ATP for posting a list of players he wouldn't vote for. Feign doesn't change his read when later learning that Maol had asked people for reads like that.
We have a ton of suspicion, but are kinda left hanging :/
I do get the sense that ATP is very much in his pile of people to keep an eye on because of passive play early on.
The only thing here is he finds Zem suspicious for his awkward post.
Light town read of Faddy for wondering about what the game actually looks like under the hood.
Now we're getting a more detailed read. First quote reads as a fairly hard sus as he thinks nin's reads look a lot like reads made by mafia. He is perhaps toning it down a bit aware that he might read stuff wrong if there's a playstyle clash. Second post reads as a harder sus as he reads the read of himself and Monkey as flat out fake.
A light town read of Leo. This read is also contrasting some earlier reads, talks about neutral which references his read of Chuggs.
I just picked out the posts I deemed to be reads from Feign and not all of the interactions. Feign felt like a pretty decent player and now that we know his alignment that could make his reads worthwhile. Sadly like me he also dropped a bit out of the game middle of D2 and so there isn't that much content and it's all raw reactions and not analytical reads.
do you think LP is the bomber
LOL you should catch up, you're about to do what I did
Fake claiming as town is pretty common in some communities.Is this because he said he was or because of his day one play? Because if it's the latter...
All the reads from Feign I could find:
Feign didn't make a detailed read of Monkey, but found her initial suspicion of his claim scummy, but moved over to reading her as light town that he didn't wanna vote D1.
There is initial suspicion from the reaction to the claim, then much later something to the way Chuggs increased aggression versus me and finally seeing him as someone trying to paint Feign as a neutral.
There's a fair bit of suspicion thrown here, but it remained kinda surface level in the posts, but it's clear from the tone he doesn't trust Chuggs.
Now things are getting spicier, Feign really doesn't like Maol and I haven't really thought about reading Maol much so I guess that's homework for me.REPLYING TO ZEM
We start with what seems like a joke about how he has to vote him if his scum play is like his own. Investigating the reply to Zem we see:
Which I read as thinking Maol might know from talking in scumchat to Zem that he is scum.
Later in the thread Feign in pinged pretty hard by Maol when he defended ATP for posting a list of players he wouldn't vote for. Feign doesn't change his read when later learning that Maol had asked people for reads like that.
We have a ton of suspicion, but are kinda left hanging :/
I do get the sense that ATP is very much in his pile of people to keep an eye on because of passive play early on.
The only thing here is he finds Zem suspicious for his awkward post.
Light town read of Faddy for wondering about what the game actually looks like under the hood.
Now we're getting a more detailed read. First quote reads as a fairly hard sus as he thinks nin's reads look a lot like reads made by mafia. He is perhaps toning it down a bit aware that he might read stuff wrong if there's a playstyle clash. Second post reads as a harder sus as he reads the read of himself and Monkey as flat out fake.
A light town read of Leo. This read is also contrasting some earlier reads, talks about neutral which references his read of Chuggs.
I just picked out the posts I deemed to be reads from Feign and not all of the interactions. Feign felt like a pretty decent player and now that we know his alignment that could make his reads worthwhile. Sadly like me he also dropped a bit out of the game middle of D2 and so there isn't that much content and it's all raw reactions and not analytical reads.
Okay maybe I'm just stuck in a tunnel, but Ty popping in with a big summery post is just setting off all of my alarm bells
Why am I not allowed to make a big post like that?I super dislike this post. This is busywork.
Feign was town but why would we trust his reads over anyone else's? SPECIFICALLY why would we trust HIS reads over anyone else's? This is kinda the straw-camel for me here.
vote: Ty4on
Because he's fucking town.
You're allowed, but you still haven't told us what actual good it is. In fact in the post itself you say "wow this wasn't really much"
are there?
Because he's fucking town.
There's like 7 mafias throwing bad shade and votes in this thread right now trying to get miselim like me going.
I had some trust in Feign early on, but was cautious since he seemed like a skilled player, but with his flip that's not something to worry about.
They all look decent, but I don't have any particular reads on the players other than Chuggs being like talking to a brick wall.Which of his reads did you agree with though because to me there is a difference in collating the reads and making use of them to further your own.
I've done that too, but I'm not caught up so I wanna spend some time in ISOs too to figure out more of the game.instead of... actually engaging... with living players... who need to be solved.
Eh, feels like Stan is happy going on gut and not evolving with the thread, which is whatever, but I don't put a lot of stock in what he's doing right now. nin's interesting. I won't call him town but I feel better about his willingness to engage now.Other than Ty who else has votes and why?
I saw Jman has votes and claimed bomb defuser. i am sure we do not vote that claim out today.
nin has a couple of votes. I liked nin as being very active early on. Stan obviously strongly disagrees that it is townie nin because I don't remeber stan coming out so hot with a scum read.
Other than Ty who else has votes and why?
I saw Jman has votes and claimed bomb defuser. i am sure we do not vote that claim out today.
nin has a couple of votes. I liked nin as being very active early on. Stan obviously strongly disagrees that it is townie nin because I don't remeber stan coming out so hot with a scum read.
Why is my post agenda-y. Please explain. Why me of the several people who said similar. Please explain. I am a living person who needs to be solved so go to.They all look decent, but I don't have any particular reads on the players other than Chuggs being like talking to a brick wall.
I've done that too, but I'm not caught up so I wanna spend some time in ISOs too to figure out more of the game.
Your whole post is very agenda-y. I know I haven't done much and yes I'm trying to make content to look good, but I don't want to be eliminated as town either.
This is a bad mindset, especially for night-kills that are explicitly killed by mafia (ehm, more so in normal games).Not to invalidate your effort, it's good for reference. But I disagree we should be looking at how he was reading people because being town he was just as in the dark as we are. The real juice is the other way around, how people were reading Feign, because scum was probably ruffled by his claim.
I'm currently rereading every mention of him but that will obviously take a while.
Then you shouldn't really be surprised that people are questioning your motivations here.I know I haven't done much and yes I'm trying to make content to look good
This is a bad mindset, especially for night-kills that are explicitly killed by mafia (ehm, more so in normal games).
Find town and find their reads, that's gonna help you track down mafia. Feign obviously didn't have perfect reads, none of them are conclusive, but he had reads from a pure perspective so that can help you see things that you maybe didn't notice.
But mafia didn't choose to kill Feign here so there's no reason to think his reads are any more accurate than any other town player alive right now.This is a bad mindset, especially for night-kills that are explicitly killed by mafia (ehm, more so in normal games).
Find town and find their reads, that's gonna help you track down mafia. Feign obviously didn't have perfect reads, none of them are conclusive, but he had reads from a pure perspective so that can help you see things that you maybe didn't notice.
You said I hadn't engaged with people which I felt was weird because that's exactly what I did when I came back and Chuggs started shading me hard.Why is my post agenda-y. Please explain. Why me of the several people who said similar. Please explain. I am a living person who needs to be solved so go to.
This here just feels like trash. Do I need some points tracker for every analysis I make to figure out how worthwhile it is and remove everything below a certain cutoff?You're allowed, but you still haven't told us what actual good it is. In fact in the post itself you say "wow this wasn't really much"
He was still town unless this game is really bastard. As you know mafia kills come with some WIFOM too so I don't think that really changes things that much.That usually holds but a day 1 modkill isn't exactly the same as being killed in the night.
Of his reads I liked his maol read because he agreed with me that he was scummy.
You said I hadn't engaged with people which I felt was weird because that's exactly what I did when I came back and Chuggs started shading me hard.
The tone of the post is all "Ty did this because X" instead of trying to figure it out.
This here just feels like trash. Do I need some points tracker for every analysis I make to figure out how worthwhile it is and remove everything below a certain cutoff?
Maol has sure been bringing up meta stuff a whole lot, more so than any other player. Not sure what to think yet but it's an easy way to fill out some posts and appear more active.
Emphasis on the not engaging part. Maol is throwing lot's of shade around, but a lot of it is passing mention of the players and not going very deep.I said why in my post. It's an easy way to talk about people and not actively engage with the content of their posts in this current game. And I think you're leaning on it too much. I do feel similarly about other players that bring it up but the other examples you've mentioned, like Monkey, I feel better about so far.
Yea this is really weirdRemove meta/me/maol from the equation.
If you read the exchange I listed.
Does it not look odd that he is following monkey like that? That he believes I am town but would still vote me today?
If I flip you can look at my back and forth with Chuggs. He's made his scumread and feels inflexible with it, as town I'd imagine him being more unsure of his read instead of tunneling me because of a Sparks read of all things.There have been a few people that have said chuggs is scummy. I thought his opening was really townie but I thought that in Eastenders too. but i think a chuggs scum read at this point is more about paranoia than anything else.
What's your read on Maol then (sorry if you've already said it)
Bullshit.
If I flip you can look at my back and forth with Chuggs. He's made his scumread and feels inflexible with it, as town I'd imagine him being more unsure of his read instead of tunneling me because of a Sparks read of all things.
Yeah, the Sparks stuff isn't the primary reason I have the bad vibes there. Day 1 town reads are whatever. It's more the constant shifting of the conversation back to Sparks that's making me concerned.
Awkward...If I flip you can look at my back and forth with Chuggs. He's made his scumread and feels inflexible with it, as town I'd imagine him being more unsure of his read instead of tunneling me because of a Sparks read of all things.
I just thought it was a typical maol-zeke interactionWhat's your read on Maol then (sorry if you've already said it)
you're a bit of a wildcard Zeke. even if I think I can read you later, if you are scum I don't want you to do something wild and do something like shoot Monkey on D1 or something crazy.
and you wouldn't be my first option for a vote, but I'd vote you if other people start a train on you for the same reason